Arctic wolf (Canis lupus arctos, vlk arkticky) from ZOO Olomouc, Czech republic
Newest photo ---------------->
Arctic wolves have usually orange eyes, but in Olomouc, few of them have bright yellow eyes
Thank you for your comments and faves ____________
INFO ABOUT THE ANIMAL:
Name: Arctic Wolf (Canis lupus arctos) Location: Canadian Arctic and the northern parts of Greenland Size: 1.8 m long, 79 cm high weight: 75 kg Diet: Caribou, musk oxen, Arctic Hares, seals, ptarmigan, lemmings. Arctic wolves eat all their prey, also its bones and fur Conservation status: common. They still live in the whole of its original range, because local conditions are too extreme for humans. Interesting facts: mother gives birth to some 2-3 pups in May. Pups are born almost black – as they get older, colour of their fur turns to white. Adults are completely white, even in summer | arctic wolves live in the pack of some 7-10 members. Only alpha male and alpha female mate | arctic wolves have shorter ears and nose than other wolves species. They also have thicker fur, shorter legs | they do not run too fast, their advantage is persistence
This photo belongs to me and I can very easily prove, that it was me, who took this shot. So please, respect my copyright if you want to use my work, ask me first to gain my permission, please! Thank you
Ok I will critique this, I critique very honestly and follow the guidelines on Naturephotographers.net here [link] and here [link]
Overall when I first saw the shot it immediately screamed "captured animals" to me, not wildlife, as there is no chance a Wolf would allow you to get that close without the use of say something like a 800mm lens, and it being an Arctic Wolf, the grass is green, as well. I am not real hip on the angle which in my opinion makes it look more like a family pet dog than a Wolf. The highlights in the top of the head are blown, though that can be easily remedied (possibly, loss of detail in white is hard to get back) with curves, levels, and a little masking in Photoshop. Or if you are shooting RAW (which you should be) process 2 RAW files, and exposure blend it to get the details back.
The composition though....I think could honestly be better. Zoom out some next time, place the subject within the frame, close isn't always better, and make the shot itself flow to the aspect ratio. One of the best articles around on Wildlife/Animals photography and composition is "The Master Guide for Wildlife Photographers: Wildlife compositions" which you can read here [link]
What I do like if the focus, very nice especially on the bottom eye, that works well. Nice focus on the mouth area and nose as well.
What I really like to see is a Wolf in a more natural environment, personally. Something that fits it's actual habitat. I know it isn't always feasible to photograph wild Wolves, but having a scene that fits it's actual weather climate does help. Work it so the image seems wild, even when it is not. Make sense?
This is lovely, usually some birds eye view photos don't work out so well but I really like this one. Nicely cropped and the subject looking into the camera so we can see those nice eyes White fur can be hard to photograph, you do so well at it but there is a bit of a blown out area on the right side of the face, this can be fixed with the dodge/burn tool and just very light, I usually have it down to 20%. Also a little bit of vignetting mainly in the top corners might be good Other than that it's a very sweet photo, like always
Overall when I first saw the shot it immediately screamed "captured animals" to me, not wildlife, as there is no chance a Wolf would allow you to get that close without the use of say something like a 800mm lens, and it being an Arctic Wolf, the grass is green, as well. I am not real hip on the angle which in my opinion makes it look more like a family pet dog than a Wolf. The highlights in the top of the head are blown, though that can be easily remedied (possibly, loss of detail in white is hard to get back) with curves, levels, and a little masking in Photoshop. Or if you are shooting RAW (which you should be) process 2 RAW files, and exposure blend it to get the details back.
The composition though....I think could honestly be better. Zoom out some next time, place the subject within the frame, close isn't always better, and make the shot itself flow to the aspect ratio. One of the best articles around on Wildlife/Animals photography and composition is "The Master Guide for Wildlife Photographers: Wildlife compositions" which you can read here [link]
What I do like if the focus, very nice especially on the bottom eye, that works well. Nice focus on the mouth area and nose as well.
What I really like to see is a Wolf in a more natural environment, personally. Something that fits it's actual habitat. I know it isn't always feasible to photograph wild Wolves, but having a scene that fits it's actual weather climate does help. Work it so the image seems wild, even when it is not. Make sense?
Nicely cropped and the subject looking into the camera so we can see those nice eyes
White fur can be hard to photograph, you do so well at it but there is a bit of a blown out area on the right side of the face, this can be fixed with the dodge/burn tool and just very light, I usually have it down to 20%. Also a little bit of vignetting mainly in the top corners might be good
Other than that it's a very sweet photo, like always
The Artist has requested Critique on this Artwork
Please sign up or login to post a critique.